Call Of Duty: World At War

**Sneaky Poptart** · 03-31-2009, 08:15 PM

Originally Posted by jweed2131

WaW was mediocre.
If this game had come out before Modern Warfare it would've been amazing,
BUT it didn't so it lives always being ocmpared to Modern Warfare.
COD4 is argueably one of the best games so it makes WaW look terrible.
WaW was still fun however don't get me wrong.

That's a good look at it, it probably would have been amazing but it's being compared to a giant (so to speak).

**____-F8-____** · 04-05-2009, 10:23 PM

today was play waw campain and theres a sniping mission where all you do is hide seek kill and run like a map in cod4

**unknownENEMY** · 05-12-2009, 05:51 PM

I love Nazi Zombies!

**gokickadogx2** · 05-12-2009, 06:31 PM

Modern warfare was batter than WAW in my oppinion....cant wait for the new one.

**-Rejected.Soul-** · 08-21-2009, 11:21 PM

Call of Duty: World at War wasn't that good, the only thing that really attracted people was Co-op. The nazi zombies is what really sold it.

Everybody refered to Call of Duty: World at War as CoD5 when that wasn't the technical name also.

Above all online wasn't the best, guns were over powered, and all the beginner guns would be so weak you couldn't top the higher levels like you could do in Call of Duty 4: Modern warfare.