PSP.Go or PSP original?

Which do you like better check the go out here:
http://www.us.playstation.com/PSP/Systems/pspgo.html
:cool:

between 1000 and go, 1000.
between 1000 and 2000, 2000.
Until full CFW on 3000, F the 3000.

PSP Go FTW


the price may be absolutely ridiculous but its portability is better, its lighter, better screen resolution, built in 16 gig hard drive, runs faster and more smooth, plus is has a nice sexy slide up screen

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SyKotik Cannon

PSP Go FTW


the price may be absolutely ridiculous but its portability is better, its lighter, better screen resolution, built in 16 gig hard drive, runs faster and more smooth, plus is has a nice sexy slide up screen

---

Truth. I love it, it's SOO sexy, I LOVE bluetooth, Sliding screen is AMAZING, etc, etc. I am going to buy one after I get a laptop.

Sorry 2000 ruled until the Battery was changed so you couldn't hack them but they are better. Lighter. smaller. And I think it has better resolution then 1000. PSP go I have no clue. psp3000 still not hackable= SUCKS!!!

I love my phat ass 1000 but my 3000 is lighter and has a mic built in... plus twice the ram. 1000 is built better than the newer 3 psp's, but the newer ones are lighter and theoretically faster (can anyone tell the difference?).

I side w/ that bitchy critic for the most part. The Go! is cheaper to make than the current PSP's yet 80$ more or so. It's kind of fucking over the users to build something cheaper and sell it for more.. but it is a new design. Personally i think i's fugly and can't see it going far... the only plus is the 16gb of obm.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Darth Bane

Sorry 2000 ruled until the Battery was changed so you couldn't hack them but they are better. Lighter. smaller. And I think it has better resolution then 1000. PSP go I have no clue. psp3000 still not hackable= SUCKS!!!

---

3000 can run homebrew and load cfw's (not perma state yet). If i'm not mistaken the 2000 has the same (or basically the same) screen as the 1000, the 3000 comes with a better screen.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BlackVenom

I love my phat ass 1000 but my 3000 is lighter and has a mic built in... plus twice the ram. 1000 is built better than the newer 3 psp's, but the newer ones are lighter and theoretically faster (can anyone tell the difference?).

I side w/ that bitchy critic for the most part. The Go! is cheaper to make than the current PSP's yet 80$ more or so. It's kind of fucking over the users to build something cheaper and sell it for more.. but it is a new design. Personally i think i's fugly and can't see it going far... the only plus is the 16gb of obm.



3000 can run homebrew and load cfw's (not perma state yet). If i'm not mistaken the 2000 has the same (or basically the same) screen as the 1000, the 3000 comes with a better screen.

---

the 2000 screen resolution is 10x better than the 1000 and the 3000 is better than the 2000 except for the shitty ass scan lines

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BlackVenom

I love my phat ass 1000 but my 3000 is lighter and has a mic built in... plus twice the ram. 1000 is built better than the newer 3 psp's, but the newer ones are lighter and theoretically faster (can anyone tell the difference?).

I side w/ that bitchy critic for the most part. The Go! is cheaper to make than the current PSP's yet 80$ more or so. It's kind of fucking over the users to build something cheaper and sell it for more.. but it is a new design. Personally i think i's fugly and can't see it going far... the only plus is the 16gb of obm.



3000 can run homebrew and load cfw's (not perma state yet). If i'm not mistaken the 2000 has the same (or basically the same) screen as the 1000, the 3000 comes with a better screen.

---

lol that's why the 2000 is better right now if the 3000 was in perma state I'd go buy one but eh...

i own 1K and 2K

1K is built better 2K does have a better screen and I can notice it loads quicker because of the doubled ram

PSP GO = Fail.