I guess for Scal..

Printable View

10-07-2009, 10:56 PM
Tension

I guess for Scal..

Hmm heres all I posted thats mine and my proof and if you see another code I forgot you test it yourself and I will check it over the others I think I forgot over but I think this is it idk..

https://www.consolediscussions.com/f.../1zno9ir-1.jpg

Code:

#Fucked Screen ;Tension ;I remade this but the othe one works fine too! 0x005595E8 0x003E0008

https://www.consolediscussions.com/f.../33p4nkz-1.jpg

Code:

#See Through Doors ;Tension ;Along with see through doors! 0x0001ac54 0x00000000

https://www.consolediscussions.com/f.../2urp0lg-1.jpg

Code:

#Full Screen ;Tension ;Hz/15 0x0001AC44 0x00000000

Cant see when you throw it but test it out yourself..
https://www.consolediscussions.com/f.../2uos4ew-1.jpg

Code:

#Invisible Nades ;Tension ;Also for all other throwing bullcrap.. ;Hz/15 0x0001AC5C 0x00000000
10-07-2009, 11:08 PM
FK-MEXICANO

Re: I guess for Scal..

the 1st and 2nd look awesome, great work ^_^
10-07-2009, 11:19 PM
Scal24

Re: I guess for Scal..

Everything but the first freezes me.
10-07-2009, 11:38 PM
CoDeX

Re: I guess for Scal..

Didn't these codes exist in the 1.40 patch?
10-07-2009, 11:50 PM
Sn0rlax

Re: I guess for Scal..

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoDeX

Didn't these codes exist in the 1.40 patch?

Yea, I was thinking the same thing.
10-08-2009, 01:38 AM
FK-MEXICANO

Re: I guess for Scal..

wah why do we need em anyways?
10-08-2009, 06:21 AM
Tension

Re: I guess for Scal..

No these wasnt in the 1.4,well I didnt see them..

Also correct me Scal if im wrong,If Im makin codes in Ad-Hoc will they work online? I made everyone except the Fucked Screen in Ad-Hoc sooo I think thats maybe why..

Sorry I am gonna just make/test onilne now,but awhile ago Bl4Ck.KiD... said that coding in Ad-Hoc is mad faster..Is exactly what he said..
10-08-2009, 07:38 AM
Scal24

Re: I guess for Scal..

I make all of mine in ad hoc. There's probably very littl that changes from ad hoc to infrastructure.
10-08-2009, 02:46 PM
Nice marmite

Re: I guess for Scal..

But there can be some changes... Usually in the hex value itself...
10-08-2009, 03:46 PM
Bl4Ck.KiD...

Re: I guess for Scal..

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tension

but awhile ago Bl4Ck.KiD... said that coding in Ad-Hoc is mad faster..Is exactly what he said..

y u gotta put me in dis lol and yea ad hoc is better you do it online its gunna search slower
10-08-2009, 09:59 PM
Sn0rlax

Re: I guess for Scal..

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bl4Ck.KiD...

y u gotta put me in dis lol and yea ad hoc is better you do it online its gunna search slower

Uhh no it isn't.
10-08-2009, 11:01 PM
Bl4Ck.KiD...

Re: I guess for Scal..

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sn0rlax

Uhh no it isn't.

yo im really gettin tried of u
10-08-2009, 11:25 PM
mexjoker95

Re: I guess for Scal..

looks like bl4ck kid got some beef with sn0rlax. I personally think ad-hoc is faster.
10-08-2009, 11:59 PM
Scal24

Re: I guess for Scal..

It doesn't make a difference. The best part about ad hoc is you don't lag out.
10-09-2009, 02:01 PM
Sn0rlax

Re: I guess for Scal..

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bl4Ck.KiD...

yo im really gettin tried of u

You're tried of me?

Next time learn to spell, before you try to start talking shit. Kthxbai. =]
10-09-2009, 02:08 PM
Bl4Ck.KiD...

Re: I guess for Scal..

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sn0rlax

You're tried of me?

Next time learn to spell, before you try to start talking shit. Kthxbai. =]

yo ur 1 to talk u been talkin shit since u got here
10-09-2009, 04:41 PM
FK-MEXICANO

Re: I guess for Scal..

lookz lik he hates pokemons xD