Yea, I agree. I loved MW2, favorite FPS for a while. But Black Ops multiplayer alone is more fun then MW2. I'm not constantly getting hit by noob tubes from spawn, they made all of the perks better even the pro. For example, in MW2 the Hardline Pro perk sucked, you only got your deathstreak one death earlier. In Black Ops, you can change your care package. It's like that with most of the perks. Also, no more annoying martyrdom or campers in a party getting nukes. And in Black Ops there are unlockables when you prestige instead of just starting over like in MW2. So far Black Ops has not had any bad glitches like in MW2 (it might be too soon) but I hated how it took I.W. FOREVER to fix anything in that game, like the javelin glitch or the care package glitch.

Campaign wise, I think I would have to go with MW2 just for the epic storyline. Black Ops' storyline was indeed one of the best campaigns that I have played in a while because of it being unpredictable. They also did a nice job piecing together all of the wars in Mason's history (I didn't think they'd be able to pull that off well). But when comparing the two, I personally think that MW2 just had more depth. It might just be because it was a sequel where as Black Ops is a completely new storyline.

In my opinion, MW2 had a better campaign/storyline and Black Ops has a much better multiplayer.